Canonical page: https://sequoia-research.com/writing/are-dst-investments-safe-in-2026-how-to-evaluate-claims-about-capital-preservation
Author: Sequoia Research
Published: 2026-10-18T08:17:38.529Z
Updated: 2026-10-18T08:17:38.529Z

# Are DST Investments Safe in 2026? How to Evaluate Claims About Capital Preservation

## What Is This Article About?

This article examines capital-preservation claims in two selected 2026 Delaware statutory trust (DST) sources. It reads the claims beside their limits and separates a goal from a promise to repay an investor. Original examples trace an owner's money through prices, costs, reserves, and limited support. The purpose is to help you ask what is protected, for whom, against which loss, and on what evidence.

## Table of Contents

- [Define the Capital You Want to Preserve](#define-the-capital-you-want-to-preserve)
- [Read Two Selected 2026 DST Sources in Context](#read-two-selected-2026-dst-sources-in-context)
- [Classify the Claim Before Testing It](#classify-the-claim-before-testing-it)
- [Trace the Investment From Contribution to Sale Proceeds](#trace-the-investment-from-contribution-to-sale-proceeds)
- [Test What a Debt-Free Structure Actually Changes](#test-what-a-debt-free-structure-actually-changes)
- [Identify Who Benefits From a Guarantee](#identify-who-benefits-from-a-guarantee)
- [Check the Amount, Conditions, and Capacity Behind Support](#check-the-amount-conditions-and-capacity-behind-support)
- [Keep Reserve Cash Separate From New Protection](#keep-reserve-cash-separate-from-new-protection)
- [Distinguish a Capital Value From Cash You Can Obtain](#distinguish-a-capital-value-from-cash-you-can-obtain)
- [Read Capital-Preservation Track Records With Defined Tests](#read-capital-preservation-track-records-with-defined-tests)
- [Compare Preserved Dollars With Preserved Buying Power](#compare-preserved-dollars-with-preserved-buying-power)
- [Write a Supported Conclusion About the Claim](#write-a-supported-conclusion-about-the-claim)
- [FAQ](#faq)

## Define the Capital You Want to Preserve

A capital-preservation promise needs a stated amount, date, and measure. An investor may mean receiving the full original check back at sale. A property manager may mean maintaining a building's condition. A forecast may count years of distributions toward recovery of the original investment. Those are different tests.

Start by writing your own question in dollars. For example, would you need the original $120,000 available as cash on a certain date? Would a smaller final payment plus earlier distributions satisfy your goal? Would receiving the same dollar amount after several years be enough if its buying power had fallen? Your answer helps define the evidence you need.

A claim about preserving property value also needs a clear basis. The property purchase price, appraised value, total amount raised, and investor's contribution can differ. A building could sell for its original purchase price while investors receive less than they contributed. Entry and exit costs help explain how that can happen.

### Separate the Goal From the Proposed Method

A goal says what the manager hopes to achieve. A method describes how the manager plans to pursue it. A payment promise needs a closer look. Ask about the contract, parties, terms, and your rights if payment fails. None of those questions is answered by a reassuring adjective alone.

The examples in this article are educational. Except for the two brief named source reviews below, all entities, contracts, professional conclusions, figures, and outcomes are invented. They are not estimates for either named offering. Separate branches are marked so that a reader does not combine unrelated losses or protections.

The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) private-placement bulletin, updated in September 2026, describes limited disclosure, difficult resale, and possible total loss. It also says Form D is not SEC approval. These points apply to the review of a private offering even when its stated objective sounds cautious. A regulator filing does not convert a business goal into a capital guarantee. [SEC private-placement bulletin](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins/private-placements-under-regulation-d-updated-investor-bulletin).

## Read Two Selected 2026 DST Sources in Context

The sample below is small. It covers one public offering memorandum and one issuer release, read in October 2026. They serve different purposes and do not support a ranking. We did not obtain a current signed loan or guarantee package for either investment. We also did not verify an investor's final result.

### NewStar: Stated Objectives and a Lender's Limited Protection

The NewStar 17 Sweetwater Springs DST private placement memorandum (PPM) is dated February 9, 2026. Printed page 12 lists goals to protect the property, preserve its value, and sell it to maximize return of capital. It expressly gives no assurance of achieving them. Page 14 describes the loan as nonrecourse to investors but warns of potential investment loss following foreclosure. Page 42 identifies a limited loan guarantee for the lender's benefit. That selected description does not promise to return an investor's contribution. This is a reading of the PPM, not a legal opinion on an executed guarantee or a current loan-status check. [NewStar PPM, selected objectives and financing passages](https://pcsalts.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/NewStar-NewStar-17-Sweetwater-DST-Private-Placement-Memorandum-PPM.pdf).

### Cove: A Debt-Free Strategy and an Express Loss Warning

Cove Capital's May 11, 2026 release says Cove Diversified Portfolio 88 DST was fully subscribed. It names capital preservation as a focus. It also reports an all-cash structure aimed at avoiding lender-related risks. The same release warns that DST investing can involve loss of the entire principal. Those statements describe a strategy and its limits. They do not prove that investors recovered their capital. We did not inspect this offering's PPM, deeds, private account records, or current debt status. The release's subscription milestone is not a completed investment exit. [Cove Capital's original Business Wire release](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260511666022/en/Cove-Capital-Investments-LLC-Fully-Subscribes-Debt-Free-Cove-Diversified-Portfolio-88-DST).

### Carry the Qualification Into Your Notes

When recording a claim, keep the qualifying sentence beside it. A research note that retains only the favorable phrase can change the meaning of the source. Record the source date, the exact investment, and whether you read a marketing statement, summary, contract, or later outcome report.

Reading a page today does not make every fact current. A February document remains a February document. A May announcement remains evidence of what was announced then. Ask what changed after those dates before relying on the material for a new decision.

## Classify the Claim Before Testing It

Start by naming the type of statement. Each type calls for different evidence. Treating all of them as guarantees can hide key differences.

| Type of statement | Original example | What would help test it? |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Objective | The plan seeks to preserve capital | The strategy, costs, risks, and assumptions |
| Structural feature | The property has no mortgage at closing | The closing and debt records for that date |
| Contractual support | A named party covers specified costs | The complete agreement, limits, and payer evidence |
| Cash balance | A reserve holds money for future work | A dated balance plus permitted uses and commitments |
| Forecast | Sale proceeds are expected to repay the investment | The full model, definitions, and alternative assumptions |
| Unsupported implication | These features mean the owner cannot lose money | Evidence for that broader statement, if any exists |

These categories are original research aids, not a regulatory classification. One document may contain several types. Review each one on its own. One supported fact does not prove every nearby claim.

### Match the Evidence to the Wording

Suppose a fictional brochure says Cedar Reach has a conservative plan and a repair reserve. A bank record could establish a balance on a date. It would not establish the meaning of conservative or prove that the balance can meet every future repair. A forecast could estimate those repairs but would not make them certain.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) discusses reasonable investigations by members recommending private placements in Notice 23-08. Its scope includes the issuer, assets, claims, and use of proceeds, as well as relevant developments and warning signs. The work depends on the facts. Our claim categories are a way to frame questions, not a test of a firm's legal compliance. [FINRA Regulatory Notice 23-08](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/23-08).

A clear follow-up asks for the evidence behind the specific claim. Ask which amount is protected and which source establishes that protection. If the answer supplies a different kind of evidence, keep the original question open.

## Trace the Investment From Contribution to Sale Proceeds

Consider the invented Cedar Reach DST. It raises $10 million of equity, buys a property for $9 million, pays $400,000 of entry costs, and keeps $600,000 in cash reserves. It has no debt. These uses account for the full $10 million. The $400,000 includes all entry costs. No extra charge is added to the investor's check.

Morgan contributes $120,000 and owns 1.2% of the equal economic interests. For this model, cash available to owners is split in that proportion. There are no special classes or priority payments. These are chosen rules for the model. Real DST terms can differ.

### An Unchanged Property Price Can Still Leave a Capital Gap

Assume the property later sells for the same $9 million. Sale costs are 2% of the price, or $180,000. The original $600,000 reserve remains intact and can be released in full. There are no other unpaid bills, taxes, loans, claims, or holdbacks in this branch.

The final owner pool is $9 million minus $180,000 plus $600,000, which equals $9,420,000. Morgan's 1.2% share is $113,040. That is $6,960 less than the original $120,000 contribution, a 5.8% terminal-payment shortfall. The building's price was preserved; the original investment was not fully recovered through the final payment alone.

| Original unchanged-price branch | Trust level | Morgan's 1.2% share |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Original equity contributed | $10,000,000 | $120,000 |
| Gross property sale price | $9,000,000 | $108,000 |
| Sale costs | $180,000 | $2,160 |
| Remaining reserve released | $600,000 | $7,200 |
| Final cash to owners | $9,420,000 | $113,040 |
| Gap versus original contribution | $580,000 | $6,960 |

The owner's column shows a share of the model's amounts. It is not a direct claim to gross sale proceeds. The same costs cannot be deducted a second time from the already net final payment.

### Earlier Income Answers a Different Question

Now add the specified operating history: over five years, the trust paid $600,000 of cash generated after all operating and trust costs. Those payments did not use the $600,000 reserve. Morgan received $7,200 during the hold. Total cash received is therefore $120,240: $7,200 earlier plus $113,040 at exit.

The total exceeds Morgan's initial check by $240, or 0.2% over the whole period before personal taxes and the time value of money. It is not a 0.2% annual return. The final payment alone is still below the original contribution.

Both descriptions can be accurate. The error occurs when a claim moves between them without saying so. Ask whether capital recovery includes prior income, return of previously held cash, or an estimated remaining value.

## Test What a Debt-Free Structure Actually Changes

In the Cedar Reach example, no mortgage means there is no mortgage payment or lender claim in the model. That removes a specific source of financial pressure. It does not create a floor beneath the property's sale price or remove the costs already paid to acquire and sell it.

Use a separate sale-price branch to see the difference. Keep the same $10 million entry equity, $600,000 reserve, equal ownership, and $600,000 of earlier operating distributions. Change only the sale price to $8.1 million, 10% below the $9 million purchase price. Sale costs remain 2% of the actual sale price.

### A Lower Sale Price Still Reaches the Owner

Sale costs are now $162,000. The final owner pool is $8.1 million minus $162,000 plus $600,000, or $8,538,000. Morgan receives $102,456. The gap versus the initial contribution is $17,544, or 14.62%.

Adding the earlier $7,200 gives Morgan total cash of $109,656. That leaves a whole-period cash loss of $10,344, or 8.62%, before personal taxes and timing effects. This is a chosen scenario, not a prediction or an estimate of the likelihood of loss.

The property price fell 10%, while the terminal-payment shortfall is 14.62% of Morgan's contribution. These figures use different starting amounts and include different costs. Do not force them to match or describe the difference as hidden debt.

### Find the Price Needed for Your Specific Test

For final cash alone to equal the original $10 million equity, the model requires 98% of the sale price plus the remaining $600,000 reserve to equal $10 million. That requires a sale price of about $9,591,837, roughly 6.58% above the original property price.

If the test instead counts the $600,000 of earlier distributions, the required sale price is about $8,979,592. The two thresholds differ because the second test credits cash already paid. Neither threshold is a valuation opinion, expected sale price, or guaranteed outcome.

Keep the selected test visible when reviewing a forecast. A business plan may meet a total-cash target while failing a final-capital target. Your own cash needs determine why that distinction might matter.

## Identify Who Benefits From a Guarantee

The word guarantee does not name the protected person or payment. Start with the beneficiary: who has the right to receive what is promised? Then name the debt or duty being backed. Covering a lender's loss differs from paying back an owner's original check.

In a separate invented case, a sponsor affiliate agrees to cover certain cleanup costs owed to a lender. That statement alone gives Morgan no established right to demand $120,000 at exit. It concerns another debt and another recipient. It may help the deal, but its effect on the owner's recovery needs more study.

### Read the Promise as a Complete Sentence

Write a short description with these parts: named payer, named beneficiary, covered event, covered amount, conditions, and time limit. If a part is missing from the material available to you, mark it missing. Do not substitute the sponsor's brand name for the exact legal payer.

A phrase such as sponsor-backed can conceal several different arrangements. It might refer to money invested alongside owners, a limited contract, a nonbinding intention, or simply sponsorship of the offering. Ask which meaning the speaker intends and where it appears in the documents.

Read the documents before doing the math. A lawyer would need to assess whether the promise can be enforced. The law, remedies, and any conflicts between documents matter. This article does not decide any real party's rights or supply a legal opinion.

### Personal Liability and Investment Loss Are Different

A limitation on an investor's duty to pay a lender can be valuable. It addresses whether the lender can demand more money from that person under the relevant terms. It does not necessarily protect the money already invested in the asset.

In a simple example, Morgan pays $120,000. Assume the loan terms do not require Morgan to make any further personal payment. If the investment returns nothing, the $120,000 can still be lost. Not having to add another $40,000 would limit a separate possible duty to pay. It would not restore the original $120,000.

A review should describe the protection at its actual level. Avoid translating limited personal exposure into an assurance of full capital recovery.

## Check the Amount, Conditions, and Capacity Behind Support

Even when the right beneficiary has a valid claim, the scope and amount can be limited. A stated maximum is not always the amount still available. Prior payments, shared limits, exclusions, and timing can change what the agreement could provide.

In a separate invented support case, assume a properly reviewed agreement covers a specified repair and has a $200,000 lifetime cap. Earlier covered payments used $70,000. The remaining contractual cap is $130,000. A new eligible repair costs $170,000, so $40,000 is outside the remaining cap.

### A Remaining Cap Is Not Cash in the Bank

Now assume the payer can provide only $100,000 toward that eligible claim at the required time. This is a chosen cash assumption. It is not a legal finding about insolvency or who gets paid first. The remaining cap exceeds the funds available to pay by $30,000.

If the payer actually pays that $100,000, the repair still needs $70,000 from another source. The cap-related $40,000 and capacity-related $30,000 explain this gap. They are not two additional losses to subtract after already deducting the unpaid $70,000.

A real review would need evidence of the payer's resources and other commitments. An old balance sheet, a group asset total, or another affiliate's bank balance may not establish funds available to the obligated entity. Assets also may take time to sell, be pledged, or support other duties.

### Check Timing and Shared Limits

Suppose a different invented agreement promises to repay costs after approved work is finished. A contractor requires $80,000 before starting. Even full repayment later would not provide the cash needed at the start. Who will fund that timing gap still needs an answer.

Likewise, a $2 million limit shared across several programs is not automatically $2 million for each one. Find out how the shared limit works and what prior claims have used it. Do not allocate money to your offering without a documented basis.

These questions examine a protection's practical reach. They do not imply that a support provider will fail or that every cap makes support worthless. A limited, well-understood promise may be useful. It should be described as the promise that exists.

## Keep Reserve Cash Separate From New Protection

A reserve funded with investor money can help pay future bills. Its value comes from retaining cash for a purpose. A protective account label does not mean that an outside party will replace an investor's loss.

Return to the original Cedar Reach closing budget: the $600,000 reserve was already part of the $10 million raised. Adding it again to the initial funding total would produce a false $10.6 million. The same dollar cannot both be counted in the contribution and treated as new support supplied from elsewhere.

### Record Uses Before Treating a Balance as Free Cash

In a separate reserve snapshot, an account has $600,000. Of that amount, $200,000 is restricted to a specified use and $150,000 is committed to signed work. Assume these two amounts do not overlap. That leaves $250,000 unassigned under this example's definitions.

Calling all $600,000 a flexible safety cushion would omit those constraints. But subtracting the $150,000 again after the work has been paid and the account balance already reduced would double-count the payment. Match the balance date to the status of each commitment.

Suppose the $150,000 work is paid next, with no other changes. The account falls to $450,000. The $200,000 restriction remains, and the work commitment is now zero. Unassigned cash is still $250,000. Cash declined, but the calculation of money left for other uses did not change.

### Do Not Count a Planned Refill as an Existing Balance

A forecast might assume later rent will rebuild a reserve. That is a future cash assumption. Record its source and timing separately from money held today. If the forecast depends on higher occupancy or a rent increase, the preservation claim depends on those events too.

Ask what happens if the refill is late. The answer may involve lower owner payments, delayed work, a changed plan, or another source of funds. A reserve label cannot establish which response is available. The governing documents and actual cash situation matter.

## Distinguish a Capital Value From Cash You Can Obtain

A reported value can help describe an investment, but it is not automatically an amount you can withdraw. Ask whether the figure is an appraisal, an estimated owner value, an offer to buy, or actual proceeds after a completed sale. Those records have different dates and conditions.

In a separate hypothetical, Morgan's statement shows an estimated position value of $120,000. A permitted buyer later offers $105,000. Assuming the sale is allowed and completed, a 2% selling cost leaves $102,900. That is $17,100 below the statement figure.

### Name the Event That Produces Spendable Cash

The statement and offer may use different assumptions. The example does not prove that the statement was false or that the offer represents fair value. It shows why an estimate alone does not satisfy a need for cash on a particular date.

A buyer's offer can also expire or depend on consent, records, and closing terms. Until those steps are complete, it remains a proposed transaction. A research note should distinguish a quoted price from a completed payment to the owner.

An optional repurchase program needs the same care. Who has the option to act? Is the price based on original capital, an estimated value, or another formula? Can requests be limited or delayed? A program description does not establish that a particular owner can compel payment at the original amount.

### Keep Each Clock Separate

The expected property-sale year, a loan maturity, a transfer request, and an owner's spending deadline are separate dates. A promise that may pay later can fail to meet an earlier cash need. It may still serve another useful purpose.

Write down the event needed for your intended use of the money. If the evidence supports only an estimate of future value, call it that. Do not turn a forecast into an available bank balance through wording alone.

## Read Capital-Preservation Track Records With Defined Tests

A claim about prior capital recovery needs a complete definition. Ask whether it concerns the final payment alone, all cash received, estimated remaining value, or an after-tax result. Also ask which investments are included and which are still active.

The SEC's performance bulletin explains that methods, fees, periods, and selected results affect the meaning of performance claims. It distinguishes targets from actual outcomes and warns that favorable historical examples do not establish future results. Those principles help frame a preservation-history review without turning it into a prediction. [SEC Investor Bulletin: Performance Claims](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins-47).

### Use One Explicit Population

Imagine an original list of twelve programs. Eight have finished, and four remain active. Six of the eight finished programs returned at least the original contribution through their final payment alone; two did not. That is 75% of the completed group under that specific test.

It is also six of twelve listed programs, or 50%, with a documented qualifying final payment. It is not evidence that the other 50% failed. Four have no final payment yet. Their current estimates cannot be silently treated as realized results.

Suppose one of the two completed programs below the final-payment threshold crosses it when earlier distributions are included. Seven of eight then meet the all-cash recovery test, or 87.5%. The investment history did not change. The rule used to label success changed.

### Preserve the Investor's Actual Cost Basis for the Comparison

For this research test, use the owner's actual cash contribution and clearly defined outside costs. Do not confuse that cash measure with tax basis. Different entry dates, charges, ownership classes, or later contributions can change an owner's result even within one program.

An average across a sponsor's programs cannot prove that every owner recovered capital. Ask which programs are counted and how each result is defined. Ask how unfinished cases are treated. If the needed data is missing, mark that part of the claim unverified. Do not fill the gap with a favorable guess.

## Compare Preserved Dollars With Preserved Buying Power

Receiving the same dollars later is one meaning of preservation. Maintaining what those dollars can buy is another. A review should not switch between nominal dollars and buying power without an explicit assumption.

In a separate arithmetic example, assume Morgan puts in $120,000 and receives exactly $120,000 six years later, with no interim payments. Suppose the chosen price level rises 25% over those six years. The final payment has the buying power of $96,000 in starting-period dollars: $120,000 divided by 1.25.

### State the Inflation Assumption Clearly

The $24,000 reduction in starting-period buying power is 20% of the original $120,000. It is not 25%, because the two percentages use different bases. A final payment of $150,000 would be needed to match the original buying power under this chosen price-level assumption.

These are not actual inflation data or a forecast. The example isolates the difference between preserving a dollar count and preserving purchasing power. Real household costs may also differ from a broad price index.

If an offering describes capital preservation, ask which meaning is intended. You do not need to demand that every investment solve every problem. You do need a clear basis for deciding whether the stated goal matches your own.

## Write a Supported Conclusion About the Claim

A useful conclusion can be short. It should still state what the evidence can support. Name the statement and source version. State the type of protection and what was checked. Then state the unresolved question that could affect your decision.

For the fictional Cedar Reach review, the supported conclusion is specific. Its assumed debt-free structure removes mortgage payments from the model. Entry and exit costs still create a gap between an unchanged property price and full final recovery. Earlier income changes the total-cash calculation, while a lower sale price changes both results. None of those calculations proves a future outcome.

### Ask for the Record That Could Change the Conclusion

A missing current loan schedule calls for a loan record. A claimed guarantee calls for the complete agreement and an explanation of rights. A reserve claim calls for a dated balance and restrictions. A recovery history calls for defined investor cash records. Asking for the relevant evidence is more productive than requesting a broader assurance.

Keep your own needs separate from the product description. If a fixed amount must be available on a fixed date, ask whether the investment provides that right or only a forecast. A strategy can seek to preserve capital and still be a poor match for that need.

Finally, retain a change trigger. A revised loan, reserve use, support cap, or exit term can alter the earlier conclusion. Recheck the affected claim when new evidence arrives. The aim is a conclusion that stays faithful to the facts, including the limits that remain.

## FAQ

### Are DST Investments Safe Because They Aim to Preserve Capital?

An objective describes an intended result. It does not by itself establish a right to receive the original contribution back. Review the plan, costs, contracts, payment sources, and possible outcomes. A useful conclusion identifies the specific protection and the risk it addresses.

### Does a Debt-Free DST Guarantee My Principal?

The absence of mortgage debt addresses mortgage-related obligations in a defined structure. It does not create a guaranteed sale price or eliminate transaction costs, operating needs, or market changes. The original examples above show a capital gap even without debt. They are not forecasts for the named offerings.

### Does a Sponsor Guarantee Protect Every Investor?

Read who must pay, who benefits, what event is covered, and which limits apply. A lender-focused promise is not automatically an investor repayment promise. Its enforceability and practical value need separate review. Do not infer broader rights from the word guarantee alone.

### Can an Investment Preserve Property Value but Return Less Than I Invested?

Yes, under the assumptions in the Cedar Reach example. Its property sells for its original price, but entry and sale costs leave final owner cash below the amount raised. Retained reserves and earlier distributions have distinct effects. Show each part once before drawing a conclusion.

### Should I Count Distributions When Measuring Capital Recovery?

That depends on the question. Total cash recovery includes earlier payments; final-payment recovery does not. Label the test and use the same method across the records being compared. Neither simple measure by itself describes an annual return, taxes, or the time value of cash.

### Is a Reserve an Additional Capital Guarantee?

A reserve is a cash resource with a source, date, and permitted uses. If investors funded it, it is already part of their investment. Restrictions, commitments, and later spending affect its role. The account label alone does not promise that an investor will recover a stated amount.

### What Is the Best First Question About a Preservation Claim?

Ask: which amount is protected, for which person, by which obligation, and by what date? Then request the source that supports the answer. If the claim is an objective or forecast, record it that way. Clear language helps you see where the evidence ends.

## About Sequoia Research

Sequoia Research, LLC provides independent research on DSTs and other real estate investment offerings. This library explains how to read source records, compare definitions, and test investment claims with clear examples.

## Sources

- [NewStar 17 Sweetwater Springs DST PPM](https://pcsalts.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/NewStar-NewStar-17-Sweetwater-DST-Private-Placement-Memorandum-PPM.pdf). February 9, 2026; selected printed pages 12, 14, and 42. Public text read October 18, 2026.
- [Cove Capital's Portfolio 88 release](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260511666022/en/Cove-Capital-Investments-LLC-Fully-Subscribes-Debt-Free-Cove-Diversified-Portfolio-88-DST). May 11, 2026; issuer statements, not independently verified results. Read October 18, 2026.
- [SEC private-placement bulletin](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins/private-placements-under-regulation-d-updated-investor-bulletin). August 17, 2022; updated September 21, 2026.
- [FINRA Regulatory Notice 23-08](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/23-08). May 9, 2023; covered-member investigation context.
- [SEC Investor Bulletin: Performance Claims](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins-47). September 15, 2022. All five primary source scopes inspected October 18, 2026.


## Related Reading and Tools

- [Are DST Investments Safe? Reserve Runway Calculator](https://sequoia-research.com/writing/are-dst-investments-safe-reserve-runway-calculator)
- [Delaware Statutory Trust Returns: Exit Assumption Sensitivity Grid](https://sequoia-research.com/writing/delaware-statutory-trust-returns-exit-assumption-sensitivity-grid)
- [Delaware Statutory Trust Horror Stories (2026): How to Separate Documented Facts From Online Claims](https://sequoia-research.com/writing/delaware-statutory-trust-horror-stories-2026-how-to-separate-documented-facts-from-online-claims)