Canonical page: https://sequoia-research.com/writing/delaware-statutory-trust-returns-2026-how-to-read-returns-from-programs-that-are-still-operating
Author: Sequoia Research
Published: 2026-10-17T23:27:03.709Z
Updated: 2026-10-17T23:27:03.709Z

# Delaware Statutory Trust Returns (2026): How to Read Returns From Programs That Are Still Operating

## What Is This Article About?

This article explains how to read performance reports for a Delaware statutory trust that has not finished its investment plan. It examines a dated four-program disclosure available in 2026, then uses an original example to separate cash received from estimated remaining value. You will see how an unchanged payment can coexist with a changing value, and why a future sale remains a forecast. The goal is to describe progress honestly while part of the investment is still unresolved.

## Table of Contents

- [What Ongoing DST Performance Can Tell You](#what-ongoing-dst-performance-can-tell-you)
- [A Defined 2026 Sample of Operating Programs](#a-defined-2026-sample-of-operating-programs)
- [Start With the Investor's Actual Cash Receipts](#start-with-the-investors-actual-cash-receipts)
- [Separate Distribution Rates From Completed Returns](#separate-distribution-rates-from-completed-returns)
- [Read the Remaining-Value Estimate From Property to Investor](#read-the-remaining-value-estimate-from-property-to-investor)
- [Check What the Valuation Method Measures](#check-what-the-valuation-method-measures)
- [Keep Cash Payments and Value on the Same Date](#keep-cash-payments-and-value-on-the-same-date)
- [Treat Future DST Sale Proceeds as a Separate Scenario](#treat-future-dst-sale-proceeds-as-a-separate-scenario)
- [Understand an Interim IRR Before Using It](#understand-an-interim-irr-before-using-it)
- [Check the Program's Stage and Remaining Obligations](#check-the-programs-stage-and-remaining-obligations)
- [Build an Ongoing-Performance Review That Can Be Updated](#build-an-ongoing-performance-review-that-can-be-updated)
- [FAQ](#faq)
- [About Sequoia Research](#about-sequoia-research)
- [Sources](#sources)

## What Ongoing DST Performance Can Tell You

An operating DST can have a meaningful payment record without having a completed return. Owners may have received cash for several years while their remaining interest is still tied to unsold property. A useful report shows what has happened and what remains exposed to change.

Start with three separate parts. The first is cash already received by the investor. The second is any estimate of the interest still held. The third is a forecast of future cash and eventual sale proceeds. Each part answers a different question and needs different evidence.

A bank deposit can support a receipt. A valuation report can support an estimate under its stated method. A sale forecast can explain the assumptions behind a plan. None of those records automatically proves the other two.

This distinction matters when someone says a program is returning 6%. That might mean last year's cash divided by the initial investment. It might be the latest monthly payment multiplied by twelve. It might be a projected annual distribution. Or it might be a total-return calculation that includes an estimated value. Ask which one before comparing the figure with another investment.

The SEC's performance bulletin encourages readers to examine calculation methods, costs and the difference between actual and hypothetical results. Those questions apply even when a presentation looks simple. A familiar percentage symbol does not tell you what is inside the calculation. [SEC: Performance Claims](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins-47)

Ongoing performance also has several dates. A report issued in October might describe cash through June and a value measured the previous December. Its publication date cannot make those inputs equally current. Write down the date of each component before adding them.

An incomplete outcome is not automatically a poor outcome. It is an outcome that is still being formed. The job is to state what is known, what is estimated, and what events must occur before a final result can be measured.

## A Defined 2026 Sample of Operating Programs

The February 9, 2026 NewStar 17 Sweetwater Springs PPM lists four operating DST programs in Table 1, printed page 80. This is the defined sample, not a market survey. The selected columns report distributions:

| Program identified in the table | 2025 actual average | Annualized average from inception through December 31, 2025 |
|---|---:|---:|
| Oakwood Commons | 3.79% | 3.83% |
| Crescent Villas | 3.85% | 3.76% |
| NewStar 6 Tranquil Gardens BTR | 3.93% | 4.25% |
| NewStar 14 Hadley Crossing | 4.36% | 4.36% |

The page image confirms the column and footnote alignment. These are issuer-reported figures, not independently reconstructed owner returns. Operating status is stated as of the memorandum's date. October 2026 status, individual cash ledgers, current value and final proceeds were not verified. The selected table supplies no current valuation for these interests. The rates therefore do not establish completed investment returns. [NewStar PPM, printed page 80](https://pcsalts.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/NewStar-NewStar-17-Sweetwater-DST-Private-Placement-Memorandum-PPM.pdf)

## Start With the Investor's Actual Cash Receipts

For the rest of this article, use an entirely fictional investor, Ruth, and an invented investment, Larch Field DST. Every amount and event in this case is an original teaching assumption. None describes the named programs above or supplies their missing records.

Ruth invests $300,000 at the start of 2024. Her interest represents 2% of a $15 million equity offering, with the same economic rights as the other interests. Assume that her initial amount includes all entry charges and that no later capital is added. There are no separate account fees in this base case. Personal taxes and inflation are excluded.

At the June 30, 2026 review date, the supplied cash record is:

| Receipt period | Cash received by Ruth |
|---|---:|
| Calendar year 2024 | $15,000 |
| Calendar year 2025 | $18,000 |
| January through March 2026 | $3,600 |
| April through June 2026 | $3,600 |
| Cumulative receipts through June 30, 2026 | $40,200 |

The total is $40,200, or 13.4% of the initial $300,000. That is a cumulative cash-receipt ratio over two and a half years. It is not an annual rate, a statement that the investment earned a 13.4% profit, or a measure of the value still held.

In a real file, reconcile those receipts to both issuer records and the investor's account. An issuer can record a payment before the investor's bank shows it. A pending amount, a reversed payment and cash paid to a different owner need separate treatment.

Suppose another $1,800 was declared in June but reached Ruth on July 8. The June cash-received total stays $40,200. A later report can show $42,000 received through July 8. It should not silently rewrite the earlier receipt total. Whether an unpaid amount is included in a value estimate is a separate question about that estimate's method.

Record the amount, owner, payment date and covered period. A payment for June may arrive in July. A supplemental payment may cover earlier months. The period label helps explain the cash, but it does not change when Ruth had the money available.

Keep a corrected receipt separate from a new receipt. If a duplicate line is removed, the revised total reflects a record correction. It does not mean the trust took cash back. If a payment really was reversed, retain both entries and explain the net result.

The SEC's financial-statement guide distinguishes a balance at a date from cash movements over a period. That basic distinction is useful here. It does not mean every private DST must provide the same reports as a public company. [SEC: Beginners' Guide to Financial Statement](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/begfinstmtguide.htm)

## Separate Distribution Rates From Completed Returns

A rate can summarize the payment record, but its name must match its formula. Ruth's $18,000 received in 2025 divided by her initial $300,000 equals 6%. This describes one calendar year's cash on the original amount.

Her second-quarter 2026 receipt is $3,600. Multiplying it by four gives $14,400. Dividing by $300,000 gives 4.8%. That is an annualized quarterly cash rate. Only $3,600 was received during that quarter. The calculation does not establish that the next three quarters will repeat it.

Now assume a separate forecast calls for $9,000 of cash in the second half of 2026. Adding that forecast to the first half's actual $7,200 gives a projected full-year total of $16,200, or 5.4% of the original amount. The $16,200 combines history with a future assumption.

| Measure in the fictional case | Calculation | Proper description |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 cash rate | $18,000 ÷ $300,000 | Historical calendar-year cash rate: 6% |
| Latest-quarter annualization | $3,600 × 4 ÷ $300,000 | Annualized quarterly cash rate: 4.8% |
| 2026 blended outlook | ($7,200 actual + $9,000 forecast) ÷ $300,000 | Partly forecast full-year cash rate: 5.4% |

All three figures can appear in the same report without contradiction. Trouble starts when the labels disappear. Calling the 5.4% figure actual performance would hide the second-half assumption. Calling 4.8% a payment promise would turn a calculation into a commitment.

The denominator also matters. If someone divides the annualized $14,400 by a lower estimated value, the resulting rate rises without any extra cash reaching Ruth. That may describe a yield on that estimate, but it is a different measure from cash on her original investment.

An owner who joined later can have a different cash record even with the same rights per dollar. Use a separate timing example. Suppose Sam invests $150,000 on July 1, 2025. For this example only, cash accrues evenly by half-year at the same 6% annual rate, and his rights start that day. He receives $4,500 for the second half. That is 3% of his own initial cash over his six-month holding period.

Ruth received $18,000 on $300,000 for the full year. Sam's smaller cash ratio does not prove that his interest performed worse during the months he owned it. Their records cover different lengths of time. Doubling Sam's half-year ratio would produce 6%, but that is an annualization, not another $4,500 he already received.

For actual records, check the accepted ownership date and the payment rules. An amount sent to escrow may precede the date on which payment rights begin. A late receipt may cover time already earned. Do not invent those dates from the transfer amount alone.

A program-wide average also need not match every owner's rate. Entry date, class, fees and payment rights may differ. Before using that average to estimate a person's cash, confirm that the person's interest fits the method. The average is a starting question, not a substitute for the owner's ledger.

No distribution-rate formula measures the eventual sale result by itself. A program can pay steadily and later return less capital. It can also pay less cash during a period while retaining funds for a documented purpose. Investigate the cash source and remaining value before drawing a total-return conclusion.

## Read the Remaining-Value Estimate From Property to Investor

Assume a fictional June 30 report estimates Larch Field's property value at $30 million. It also lists $800,000 of trust cash, $16 million of debt and $850,000 of other liabilities. All balances refer to the same date and scope. There are no other assets or liabilities in this simplified estimate.

The estimated equity is $13.95 million: $30 million plus $800,000, less $16 million and $850,000. Ruth's assumed 2% share is $279,000. This estimate includes her share of the cash still inside the trust. It is before any hypothetical future selling costs and is not a sale offer.

The gross property figure alone would give Ruth a nominal 2% slice of $600,000. That is not her net interest value. It ignores the debt and other obligations that sit between the property and the owners.

Now combine the estimated remaining interest with her past receipts:

- Cash received through June 30: $40,200.
- Estimated remaining interest at June 30: $279,000.
- Combined cash and estimated value: $319,200.
- Difference from the initial investment: $19,200, or 6.4% over the full period.

The $19,200 is an estimated economic gain under the supplied inputs. It is not $19,200 of realized profit. Ruth has received only the stated cash and still owns the remaining interest. Its eventual proceeds may differ from $279,000.

The trust's $800,000 cash balance must not be added again after using the $279,000 estimate. Ruth's $16,000 share of that cash is already inside it. Adding it a second time would create value with no new asset or receipt.

Read the estimate's exact basis. Does it use property value or net equity? Does it include reserves, accrued bills, investor payments due or expected selling costs? Does it value Ruth's exact class and rights? A figure with the right trust name can still measure the wrong thing for her question.

If only a gross property appraisal is available, a full investor-value estimate remains incomplete. List the missing debt, liability and allocation inputs. Filling the gaps with the original purchase amounts would create a new assumption, not verify current equity.

## Check What the Valuation Method Measures

A value estimate is meaningful only with its method and date. A carrying amount in financial records, an appraisal, a sponsor estimate and an actual purchase offer may differ. Their labels help explain the differences; none should be silently substituted for another.

In a separate accounting illustration, suppose the same fictional property has a $24 million carrying amount. Keep the other June balances unchanged. Accounting equity on those supplied figures would be $7.95 million, with Ruth's 2% share equal to $159,000. That is a different basis from the $279,000 estimate using a $30 million property value.

The $120,000 difference is not a second cash loss. The two calculations used different property measures. The carrying amount alone does not establish what a buyer would pay. Likewise, an estimated market value does not erase the need to understand the financial statements.

The SEC's guide explains that reported income can include noncash items, such as depreciation, while cash-flow statements track cash movements. Read the accounting policies and supporting notes before treating book results as cash available to owners. [SEC financial-statement guide](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/begfinstmtguide.htm)

For a separate valuation sensitivity, assume $1.8 million of annual property operating income. A simple income-capitalization model divides that amount by a chosen capitalization rate. The rate translates an assumed income stream into a property-value estimate. It is not the investor's return or a current market quote in this example.

At 6%, the result is $30 million. At 6.5%, it falls to about $27.69 million. At 5.5%, it rises to about $32.73 million. Keep debt, cash, other liabilities and Ruth's share unchanged solely to isolate this one assumption.

| Assumed capitalization rate | Estimated property value | Ruth's estimated remaining interest | Cash received plus estimated interest |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| 5.5% | $32,727,272.73 | $333,545.45 | $373,745.45 |
| 6.0% | $30,000,000.00 | $279,000.00 | $319,200.00 |
| 6.5% | $27,692,307.69 | $232,846.15 | $273,046.15 |

Calculations retain full precision and round displayed dollars to cents. This is a sensitivity, not an appraisal range or a forecast with assigned probabilities. The same $40,200 payment history appears in every row. Changing the value assumption changes the estimated result without changing a single past receipt.

Ask what supports the selected income and capitalization rate in an actual report. Check whether the income is historical, adjusted or forecast. Also check whether deferred work, vacancy and lease changes are already reflected. A value that assumes completed improvements may require costs and time that have not yet occurred.

## Keep Cash Payments and Value on the Same Date

A common error adds new cash receipts to an old remaining-value estimate without checking what funded the payment. The combined amount can then count the same money twice.

Use a separate update to the June case. Assume that from June 30 to September 30 there are no other cash flows or value changes. The trust pays $180,000 entirely from the $800,000 cash already included in the June estimate. Ruth receives her 2% share, or $3,600.

Trust cash falls to $620,000. Ruth's estimated remaining interest falls by $3,600, from $279,000 to $275,400. Her cumulative receipts rise by the same amount, from $40,200 to $43,800.

The combined amount stays $319,200: $43,800 received plus $275,400 remaining. It is a movement of existing value from the trust to Ruth under these deliberately simple assumptions. It is not new profit created by making the payment.

If a report instead adds $43,800 to the stale $279,000 estimate, it shows $322,800. That overstates the combined amount by $3,600. The error comes from mismatched dates, even though each number could be correct for its own date.

Actual updates will usually involve more changes. Rent can arrive, bills can be paid, debt can decline and property estimates can move. Build a bridge between the two dates rather than assume every payment is merely a reserve draw. The separate example proves only the need to reconcile the dates and cash source.

If the information needed for that bridge is unavailable, present the parts separately. State that cash is current through September while the last value estimate is from June. Do not label their sum a verified September value.

A repeated value is also not proof that nothing changed. It may mean the method has not been refreshed. Ask when the value was last assessed, what information was considered and whether later events could affect it.

## Treat Future DST Sale Proceeds as a Separate Scenario

An operating program's forecast can still be useful. It shows what must occur for a proposed outcome. Keep the forecast separate from the cash ledger and from the interim estimate.

Return to the original June review date. Discard the separate September reserve-payment illustration for this next model. Assume Ruth receives another $25,000 before a sale at the end of 2028. This is a supplied future cash forecast after all modeled ongoing costs. It is not part of the $40,200 already received.

For the sale, assume debt of $15.5 million, other closing obligations of $600,000 and remaining trust cash of $500,000. The debt is a supplied future balance, not a verified paydown schedule. Assume selling costs equal 3% of the sale price and that there are no other closing items. The $500,000 cash remains after the forecast distributions and is available at closing.

At a $28 million sale price, selling costs would be $840,000. Subtract those costs, debt and other obligations, then add the remaining cash. Modeled equity proceeds are $11.56 million. Ruth's 2% share would be $231,200.

Her modeled lifetime receipts would be $296,400: $40,200 past cash, $25,000 future cash and $231,200 exit proceeds. That is $3,600 less than her initial amount, a 1.2% nominal loss before personal taxes and inflation. It also ignores the time value of the payments.

| Separate sale-price assumption | Ruth's modeled exit proceeds | Past and future cash plus exit | Nominal difference from $300,000 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| $26 million | $192,400 | $257,600 | −$42,400 |
| $28 million | $231,200 | $296,400 | −$3,600 |
| $30 million | $270,000 | $335,200 | $35,200 |

These are separate outcomes under one cost formula. They are not offers, market estimates or an expected range. The future $25,000 stays the same only to isolate the sale-price effect.

The June $279,000 estimate is absent from this lifetime cash calculation. It is replaced by the modeled sale proceeds. Adding both would count the remaining interest once as an estimate and again as if sold.

Under these assumptions, Ruth needs $234,800 of exit cash to recover her original dollars after all past and forecast payments. That is a nominal recovery threshold, not an adequate investment return. A result that merely returns the original amount over several years may still fall short of her needs.

## Understand an Interim IRR Before Using It

Internal rate of return, or IRR, uses the amounts and timing of cash flows. An interim calculation often adds an estimated remaining value as a final positive entry. That entry lets the formula produce a rate while the investment is still held.

The key is to read that final entry. If it is an estimate, the resulting rate depends on an estimate. A precise answer to several decimal places does not turn the remaining interest into cash or prove that it can be sold at that value.

For Ruth, a calculation through June 30 would need her actual payment dates, the initial outflow and a clearly labeled terminal estimate. The annual and quarterly totals supplied here do not establish every receipt date. This article therefore does not present them as a reconstructed dated IRR.

If a report has the full ledger, ask for two views: the recorded cash flows and the estimated final entry used in the calculation. Then test how the result changes when that final estimate changes. The source of most uncertainty may be visible in one line.

Do not remove the remaining interest and assume the resulting cash-only calculation measures the complete investment. Ruth still owns an asset. Conversely, do not call an estimate-inclusive rate fully realized. Each approach needs a label that makes the unfinished ownership clear.

A forecast IRR through a planned 2028 sale asks another question. It uses future payments, future proceeds and future dates. Comparing it with an interim rate without explaining those differences can make progress appear better or worse for reasons unrelated to actual new cash.

The same caution applies to a multiple. Dividing cash received plus estimated value by the initial amount can summarize the selected inputs. It cannot show payment timing, sale access or how much of the result depends on valuation. Keep the cash and estimated portions visible beside any combined measure.

## Check the Program's Stage and Remaining Obligations

Operating is a status, not a complete risk description. A program that just began collecting rent has a different history from one approaching a loan maturity or property sale. State its stage before comparing performance.

Check whether closed means closed to new subscriptions or fully sold and settled. A trust can be closed to new investors while it still holds property. A completed sale can also leave unpaid bills or a holdback awaiting release. Use the source's definition rather than infer it from one word.

Changes in ownership can create another break in the record. A property sale, merger or exchange into another interest may end one measurement period and begin another. Record the actual event and consideration. Receiving a different investment does not mean the investor received the same amount in cash.

The SEC notes that private placements may have limited disclosure and be difficult to resell. An estimated value therefore should not be treated as an available withdrawal balance. Verify actual transfer rights and any proposed transaction separately. [SEC: Private Placements Under Regulation D](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins/private-placements-under-regulation-d-updated-investor-bulletin)

Remaining obligations matter even when past receipts are well documented. Review debt maturity, required work, unpaid costs, lease expirations and restricted cash. Ask which items are included in the latest estimate and which could affect later cash. A historical payment record cannot resolve a future funding gap by itself.

Avoid treating a lack of recent value data as evidence that the original value remains intact. Leave the value unverified. Likewise, a reduced estimate does not tell you why it changed. The cause might involve property assumptions, debts, costs, the valuation method or several items together.

A useful update names the changed input and its effect. It should not simply replace yesterday's percentage with today's percentage and leave the reader to guess what happened.

## Build an Ongoing-Performance Review That Can Be Updated

Begin the review with a clear cutoff and exact ownership. Keep the original investment, subsequent contributions and any change in rights visible. Then separate receipt evidence, remaining-value evidence and forecasts into labeled parts of the file.

For Ruth's June case, the short review would report $40,200 in supplied historical receipts. It would separately report a $279,000 estimated remaining interest under the stated balances. It would explain that the $319,200 combined figure includes an unsold interest and is before hypothetical selling costs. The later sale table would remain a separate forecast.

Attach the source behind each actual claim. For cash, retain the payment record and account reconciliation. For value, retain the dated calculation, assumptions, balances and rights allocation. For a forecast, retain the version and the assumptions that could change it.

FINRA's private-placement guidance addresses covered firms' investigation of issuer claims and past-performance representations. It also discusses reviewing third-party work with care and seeking primary records. Those are relevant questions for a review file; this article does not certify that a firm's regulatory duties have been met. [FINRA Regulatory Notice 23-08](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/23-08)

When a new report arrives, preserve the prior version. Identify whether the update reflects new cash, a corrected record, a different value assumption or a change in the future plan. That distinction helps readers understand whether an apparent improvement came from the property, a payment or the model.

Finish with the open questions that could change the conclusion. An unavailable current value, uncertain cash restriction or incomplete sale-cost estimate should stay visible. The best ongoing report gives a usable account of progress without pretending that the unfinished part has already happened.

## FAQ

### Can a DST Have Positive Distributions and a Negative Total Return?

Yes. Cash paid during ownership is only one part of the result. A lower remaining value or eventual capital loss can outweigh those payments. A completed total return requires the relevant cash flows and final outcome; an interim estimate should be labeled as such.

### Does a 2026 Report Necessarily Show 2026 Performance?

No. The document's date and the measurement period can differ. Read the column headings and footnotes. A 2026 memorandum may report earlier-year distributions, while another report may combine recent cash with an older value estimate. Preserve each date rather than assume a common cutoff.

### Is an Estimated DST Value Money I Can Withdraw?

No. An estimate does not create a buyer, a redemption right or available cash. Review the interest's restrictions and the terms of any actual transaction. Also check whether the estimate reflects debt, expenses, reserves and the specific ownership rights being valued.

### Why Did My Cash Rate Rise Without a Larger Payment?

The denominator may have changed. Dividing the same payment by a lower estimated value produces a higher percentage. That does not increase the dollars received. Ask whether the report uses original invested cash, estimated current value or another base, and compare like measures.

### Should Past Distributions Be Added to an Interim Value?

They can be combined for a clearly defined analysis, but align the cutoff and avoid duplication. The remaining value must reflect cash already removed from the trust. Show cash received and estimated remaining value separately so the reader can see which part is realized cash.

### Can I Compare an Interim IRR With a Completed DST IRR?

Only with the differences clearly understood. The interim rate may rely on an estimated final value, while the completed record may use actual proceeds. Dates, fees, rights and included payments must also match the stated method. Similar-looking rates do not make the evidence equally complete.

### What If the Sponsor Has Not Supplied a Current Valuation?

Report the verified payment history and identify the missing valuation. Do not assume the original price remains current, and do not treat missing information as zero value. Request the relevant record and explain which conclusions remain unavailable until it is reviewed.

## About Sequoia Research

Sequoia Research, LLC provides independent research on DSTs and other real estate investment offerings. This educational article explains how to separate reported distributions, estimated remaining value and future sale assumptions. It does not rate the named programs or replace advice about a specific investment, legal issue or tax result.

## Sources

- [NewStar 17 Sweetwater Springs PPM](https://pcsalts.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/NewStar-NewStar-17-Sweetwater-DST-Private-Placement-Memorandum-PPM.pdf). February 9, 2026; printed page 80, selected ongoing-program distribution columns.
- [SEC: Performance Claims](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins-47). September 15, 2022.
- [SEC: Beginners' Guide to Financial Statement](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/begfinstmtguide.htm). February 4, 2007; basic financial-statement distinctions.
- [SEC: Private Placements Under Regulation D](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins/private-placements-under-regulation-d-updated-investor-bulletin). August 17, 2022; updated September 21, 2026.
- [FINRA Regulatory Notice 23-08](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/23-08). May 9, 2023; covered-member private-placement guidance.


## Related Reading and Tools

- [Delaware Statutory Trust Returns: Dated Cash-Flow Return Calculator](https://sequoia-research.com/writing/delaware-statutory-trust-returns-dated-cash-flow-return-calculator)
- [Delaware Statutory Trust Returns: Exit Assumption Sensitivity Grid](https://sequoia-research.com/writing/delaware-statutory-trust-returns-exit-assumption-sensitivity-grid)
- [Delaware Statutory Trust Fees: A Guide to Upfront, Ongoing, and Exit Costs](https://sequoia-research.com/writing/delaware-statutory-trust-fees-a-guide-to-upfront-ongoing-and-exit-costs)